Help me study for my Philosophy class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.
Write a paper in which you answer the question below. Make sure that you don’t represent anyone else’s work as your own.
Carefully describe and explain the best version of Paley’s argument. Next describe what you take to be the best objection to Paley’s argument. Finally say whether you think there is an adequate response to the objection that can be made on Paley’s behalf. Explain why or why not.
word requirement: at least two and a half pages (double spaced)
Note: you don’t need to use complex syntax/sentence structure, but the evidence should be sufficient and support your argument. Logic and structure of the paper should be clear.